Fideicommissorum libri
Ex libro IV
Dig. 36,1,70Idem libro quarto fideicommissorum. Si heres, ab eo qui cum moreretur solvendo non fuit rogatus hereditatem restituere, suspectam sibi dicit, dubium non est, quin hodie coactus ex Trebelliano senatus consulto restituere possit. sed et si sua sponte adierit, ex eodem senatus consulto restituturus est, quamvis, cum summa aut certum corpus per fideicommissum ab eo qui solvendo non fuit datum est, perinde non debeatur atque si legatum esset: eo enim casu legatarii, superiore heredis vice fungi eum, cui fideicommissum relictum est. 1Si totam hereditatem rogatus restituere tu sponte adieris et, sine deductione quartae partis restitueris, difficile quidem crederis per ignorantiam magis, non explendi fideicommissi causa hoc fecisse: sed si probaveris per errorem te quartam non retinuisse, reciperare eam poteris.
The Same, Trusts, Book IV. Where an heir, who was asked to transfer an estate by a person who was bankrupt at the time of his death, alleges that he thinks that it is insolvent, there is no doubt that, under the present interpretation of the Trebellian Decree of the Senate, he can be compelled to transfer the estate, and, even though he should accept it voluntarily, it must be: transferred under the said Decree, although, if a certain sum of money, or a specified article of property should be given in trust by one who is insolvent, it is considered not to be due, just as if it had been directly bequeathed; for, in this instance, the person to whom the property is left in trust takes the place of a legatee, while, in the former one, he takes the place of the heir. 1If, having been charged to transfer an estate, you accept it voluntarily, and deliver it without deducting the fourth, it will be difficult to believe that you have done this rather through ignorance, than for the purpose of more completely executing the trust. If, however, you can prove that you did not reserve the fourth through mistake, you can recover it.