Fideicommissorum libri
Ex libro III
Dig. 36,1,69Valens libro tertio fideicommissorum. Si postulante me suspectam hereditatem ex decreto praetoris adieris nec ego postea eam mihi restitui velim nec bonis me immiscere, hoc fieri debet, ut (quod Octaveno non ineleganter videbatur) a praetore perinde actiones in me dentur, ac si hereditatem recepissem, quod est iustius. 1Etiam eo tempore, quo creditorum fraudandorum consilium inieris, citra periculum interdicti fraudatorii hereditatem suspectam adibis et restitues mihi, quia et remoto fideicommisso liberum tibi fuerat nolenti adire hereditatem creditores tuos tali commodo fraudare, et ego nihil turpiter faciam recipiendo eam hereditatem, quam remota postulatione mea creditores compellere te ut adires non potuerint. 2Sed et filius suus heres patri rogatus sit a patre hereditatem mihi restituere, cum suorum creditorum fraudandorum consilium inisset, tamquam suspectam ex decreto praetoris restituerit mihi, vix fraudatorio interdicto locus erit, quia bonis patris eius venditis nihil proprium creditores eius ex ea hereditate ferre potuerint: nisi forte proprii creditores filii audiri debeant, si postulent, ut dimissis patris eius bona vendere sibi permittatur. 3Si donationis causa suspectam hereditatem sibi heres dixerit et restituerit ei, qui solidum capere non possit, auferetur ei id quod capere non potest. idem dicendum est et si citra consilium donandi fiduciarius heres id fecerit.
Valens, Trusts, Book III. If, upon my application, and, under the decree of the Prætor, you accept an estate suspected of being insolvent, and I should afterwards be unwilling to have it transferred to me, or to concern myself with it, the following course (which is not improperly approved by Octavenus) should be pursued, namely, the Prætor should grant actions against me just as if I had received the estate; which opinion is perfectly correct. 1At the same time when you have formed a design to defraud your creditors, you can enter upon an estate suspected of being insolvent, and transfer it to me, without running the risk of an interdict on the ground of fraud; because, even though you were not charged with the trust in my favor, you are at liberty to refuse to accept the estate, and by doing so can defraud your creditors; and I will not act dishonorably in accepting the said estate which your creditors could not have compelled you to enter upon if I had not required you to do so. 2Where a son, who is his own master, becomes the heir of his father, and is charged by him to transfer his estate to me; and, having formed the design of defrauding his creditors, transfers the estate to me under the decree of the Prætor, after having pretended that he believes it to be insolvent, there will hardly be ground for the application of an interdict based on fraud; because if the property of his father had been sold, his creditors could not have obtained anything belonging to him out of the estate; unless the creditors of the son himself should be heard, if they ask to be permitted to sell the property of the son without including that of the father. 3If the heir, for the purpose of making a donation, should say that he suspects the estate of being insolvent, and should transfer it to someone who has no right to take it, the beneficiary of the trust shall be deprived of that to which he is not legally entitled. The same rule will apply where the fiduciary heir does this without the intention of making a donation.