Responsorum libri
Ex libro I
Dig. 2,15,10Idem libro primo responsorum. De re filiorum, quos in potestate non habuit, transigentem patrem minime eis subesse placet.
Dig. 17,2,73Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Maximino respondit, si societatem universarum fortunarum coierint, id est earum quoque rerum, quae postea cuique adquirentur, hereditatem cuivis eorum delatam in commune redigendam. idem maximae respondit, si societatem universarum fortunarum ita coierint, ut quidquid erogetur vel quaereretur communis lucri atque impendii esset, ea quoque, quae in honorem alterius liberorum erogata sunt, utrisque inputanda.
Ulpianus, Opinions, in Answer to Maximin, Book I. Where persons form a partnership of their entire property, that is to say of whatever property either one may subsequently acquire, an estate which falls to either of them must be placed in the common fund. He also stated to Maximin that, where persons form a partnership of their entire property in such a way that whatever is expended or gained shall be to the common profit or expense; any sums which may be expended for the children of either must be charged to both.
Dig. 20,4,10Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Si et iure iudicatum et pignus in causa iudicati ex auctoritate eius qui iubere potuit captum est, privilegiis temporis fore potiorem heredem eius, in cuius persona pignus constitutum est.
Dig. 22,1,31Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Quod in stipulatione sic adiectum est: ‘et usuras, si quae competierint’, nullius esse momenti, si modus certus non adiciatur.
Dig. 22,3,22Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Eum, qui voluntatem mutatam dicit, probare hoc debere.
Dig. 23,4,25Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Quod de reddenda dote, si data fuisset, mortua in matrimonio filia convenit, idem de non petenda quoque videri convenisse ac patrem pacti conventi exceptionem nanctum ad heredem suum transmississe.
Dig. 26,7,19Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Actus sui rationem concuratori reddere non esse compellendum: sed nisi cum eo administrationem communicet aut si non ex fide curam gerat, suspectum postulari posse.
Dig. 27,3,19Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Si probatum est nomen debitoris a novissimo curatore, frustra tutorem de eo conveniri.
Dig. 27,4,5Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Heredem tutoris, si eam summam solverit, in quam obligati pupilli fuerunt, actionem contrariam adversus eos habere posse respondi.
Dig. 27,6,12Idem libro primo responsorum. Ex eo, quod interrogatus tutorem se esse respondit, nulla eum actione teneri: si tamen, cum tutor non esset, responso suo in aliquam captionem adulescentem induxit, utilem actionem adversus eum dandam.
The Same, Opinions, Book XII. Where a party, having been interrogated in court, answers that he is a guardian, he will not be liable to any action for making this statement. Where, however, he was not a guardian, and the minor was in any way defrauded through his answer, an equitable action should be granted against him.
Dig. 32,68Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Iunianio respondit testatorem adiciendo ‘praedium Seianum omne’ eam quoque partem fundi supra scripti quasi ad se pertinentem videri per fideicommissum reliquisse, quam ex causa pignoris nactus est, salvo scilicet iure debitoris. 1Ex his verbis: ‘curate agros attendere, et ita fiet, ut filius meus filios vestros vobis condonet’, fideicommissum peti non posse. 2Servos communes a Seia ita relictos ‘si mei erunt cum moriar’ non deberi, si modo hoc sensit testatrix, ut ita deberentur, si in solidum eius fuissent. 3Praediis cum his enthecis, quae in ea possessione sunt, relictis mancipia quoque praediorum, cum illic testamenti facti tempore fuerunt, cedent: sed et quae postea accesserunt, si modo hoc testator manifeste expressit.
Ulpianus, Opinions, Book I. Ulpianus stated to Julianus that the testator, by adding, “The entire Seian Estate,” was understood to have left also that portion of the above-mentioned land which seemed to be appurtenant to it by the terms of the trust, and which he had obtained by way of pledge; the right of the debtor to the same being reserved. 1The execution of a trust cannot be demanded under the following words: “Be sure to take good care of my fields, and the result will be that my son will give you your children.” 2Where slaves held in common with another are bequeathed by Seia, under the condition, “If they should be mine when I die,” they will not be due; provided the testatrix intended that they should be due if they were entirely hers at that time. 3Where certain tracts of land are left, together with the stores situated thereon, the slaves who belonged to said lands when the will was made will be included in the legacy, as well as those who were subsequently attached to it; provided the testator plainly showed that this was his intention.
Dig. 40,5,52Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Posteaquam a creditore alienati sunt servi, quibus fideicommissa libertas adscripta est, non nisi ex iusta causa adversus heredem subveniri eis posse.
Dig. 40,12,31Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Filium ob hoc, quod patri heres extitit, prohiberi a patre suum servum manumissum in servitutem petere.
Dig. 45,2,8Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. His verbis: ‘eaque praestari stipulanti tibi spopondimus’ interesse, quid inter contrahentes actum sit: nam si duo rei facti sint, eum qui absens fuit non teneri, praesentem autem in solidum esse obligatum, aut si minus, in partem fore obstrictum.
Ulpianus, Opinions, Book I. The intention of the contracting parties must be determined from the following words, “What we have promised to furnish you, as stipulator,” for if both of them have become joint-promisors, and one is absent, he will not be bound, but the one who is present will be liable for the entire amount; or if they are not joint-promisors, he only will be liable for his share.
Dig. 46,3,45Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Callippo respondit, quamvis stipulanti uxori vir spoponderit dirempto matrimonio praedia, quae doti erant obligata, in solutum dare, tamen satis esse offerri dotis quantitatem. 1Idem Frontoni respondit perseveranti tutori in tutelae administratione, licet capitis reo, potuisse id, quod pupillo bona fide debetur, exsolvi.
Ulpianus, Opinions, Book I. It was held by Callippus that although a husband had promised his wife, who was the stipulator, that in case the marriage should be dissolved, the land which was hypothecated for the dowry should be given in payment, still it would be sufficient to tender the amount of the dowry. 1The same authority stated to Fronto, that if a guardian continued to administer the affairs of the guardianship, although he had been accused of a capital crime, payment could be made to him of what was actually due to his ward.
Dig. 46,5,10Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Valeriano respondit: si praeses, qui ante in triennium caveri iusserat, postea in longum tempus caveri praecepit: quia a prima stipulatione prorsus discedi voluerat, exceptionem primae stipulationi obligatis peperisse videtur.
Ulpianus, Opinions, Book I. Answers Valerianus. If the Prætor, who previously had ordered security furnished for three years afterwards, should direct it to be given for a longer time, because he desired that the first stipulation should be abandoned, he is considered to have granted an exception to those who were bound by the first stipulation.
Dig. 49,14,33Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Eum, qui debitoris fisci adiit hereditatem, privilegiis fisci coepisse esse subiectum.
Dig. 50,12,5Ulpianus libro primo responsorum. Charidemo respondit ex epistula, quam muneris edendi gratia absens quis emisit, compelli eum ad editionem non posse.