De officio proconsulis libri
Ex libro IV
Dig. 1,3,34Idem libro IIII de officio proconsulis. Cum de consuetudine civitatis vel provinciae confidere quis videtur, primum quidem illud explorandum arbitror, an etiam contradicto aliquando iudicio consuetudo firmata sit.
Ad Dig. 1,3,34Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 17, Note 1.The Same, Book IV. When anyone seems to be confident concerning the custom of a city or province, I think it should first be determined whether that custom has been confirmed by a judicial decree after it had been disputed.
Dig. 49,18,4Ulpianus libro quarto de officio proconsulis. Viae sternendae immunitatem veteranos non habere Iulio Sossiano veterano rescriptum est. nam nec ab intributionibus, quae possessionibus fiunt, veteranos esse excusatos palam est. 1Sed et naves eorum angariari posse Aelio Firmo et Antonio Claro veteranis rescriptum est.
Ulpianus, On the Duties of Proconsul, Book IV. It was stated in a Rescript addresed to Julius Sossianus, a veteran, that veterans are not exempt from contributing to the repair of highways, for it is clear that they are not excused from paying taxes on their property. 1It is stated in a Rescript addressed to Sillius Firmus and Antoninus Clarus that requisitions can be made for their ships.
Dig. 50,4,6Ulpianus libro quarto de officio proconsulis. Rescripto divorum fratrum ad Rutilium Lupum ita declaratur: ‘Constitutio, qua cautum est, prout quisque decurio creatus est, ut ita et magistratum apiscatur, totiens servari debet, quotiens idoneos et sufficientes omnes contingit. ceterum si ita quidam tenues et exhausti sunt, ut non modo publicis honoribus pares non sint, sed et vix de suo victum sustinere possint: et minus utile et nequaquam honestum est talibus mandari magistratum, praesertim cum sint qui convenienter ei et suae fortunae et splendori publico possint creari. sciant igitur locupletiores non debere se hoc praetextu legis uti et de tempore, quo quisque in curiam allectus sit, inter eos demum esse quaerendum, qui pro substantia sua capiant honoris dignitatem’. 1Debitores rerum publicarum ad honores invitari non posse certum est, nisi prius in id quod debetur rei publicae satisfecerint. sed eos demum debitores rerum publicarum accipere debemus, qui ex administratione rei publicae reliquantur: ceterum si non ex administratione sint debitores, sed mutuam pecuniam a re publica acceperint, non sunt in ea causa, ut honoribus arceantur. plane vice solutionis sufficit, ut quis aut pignoribus aut fideiussoribus idoneis caveat: et ita divi fratres Aufidio Herenniano rescripserunt. sed et si ex pollicitatione debeant, quae tamen pollicitatio recusari non potest, in ea sunt condicione, ut honoribus arceantur. 2Si quis accusatorem non habeat, non debet honoribus prohiberi, quemadmodum non debet is, cuius accusator destiterit. ita enim imperator noster cum divo patre suo rescripsit. 3Sciendum est quaedam esse munera aut personae aut patrimoniorum, itidem quosdam esse honores. 4Munera, quae patrimoniis iniunguntur, vel intributiones talia sunt, ut neque aetas ea excuset neque numerus liberorum nec alia praerogativa, quae solet a personalibus muneribus exuere. 5Sed enim haec munera, quae patrimoniis indicuntur, duplicia sunt: nam quaedam possessoribus iniunguntur, sive municipes sunt sive non sunt, quaedam non nisi municipibus vel incolis. intributiones, quae agris fiunt vel aedificiis, possessoribus indicuntur: munera vero, quae patrimoniorum habentur, non aliis quam municipibus vel incolis.
Ulpianus, On the Duties of Proconsul, Book IV. The following was stated in a Rescript of the Divine Brothers addressed to Rutilius Luppus: “The Constitution by which it is provided that anyone who has been created a decurion can obtain the office of magistrate should be observed, whenever the parties concerned are solvent and properly qualified. Where, however, they are of such inferior rank and slender resources that they are not only unsuited to the enjoyment of public honors, but are also scarcely able to support themselves, it is both useless and dishonorable for such persons to be charged with the office of magistrate, especially when there are others who can be appointed, and who, by their fortunes and their rank, are suited to the position. Therefore, let all who are wealthy know that they should not avail themselves of this provision of the law, and that when anyone is to be chosen in an assembly, inquiry should be made among those who are present for persons who, by reason of their means, are capable of assuming the dignity of the office.” 1It is certain that public debtors cannot be raised to municipal honors, unless they first pay what they owe to the city. We should understand such debtors to be those in whose hands a balance remains from the administration of public business. When, however, they are not debtors of this description, but have borrowed money from the city they are not in a position to be excluded from municipal honors. It is evident that it will be sufficient if, instead of payment, they make provision for it by means of pledges or solvent sureties. This was stated by the Divine Brothers in a Rescript addressed to Aufidius Herennianus. Where they are indebted merely under a promise which cannot be refused, they are in such a position that they must be excluded from municipal honors. 2Where anyone, though guilty of an offence, has not been accused, he should not be excluded from public office any more than if he had an accuser who withdrew from the prosecution; for Our Emperor with his Divine Father stated this in a Rescript. 3It must be noted that certain employments are either personal or patrimonial, just as certain honors are. 4Employments which have reference to patrimonies, or the payment of taxes, are of such a nature that neither age nor the number of children, nor any other privilege which usually exempts persons from personal employments, will be a valid excuse for declining them. 5These employments which have reference to patrimonies are of a double nature, for some of them are enjoined upon possessors, whether they are citizens or not; and others are enjoined upon the residents or citizens of a town. Taxes imposed upon lands or buildings have reference to the possessors of the same, but patrimonial employments only concern municipalities or their inhabitants.
Dig. 50,6,2Idem libro quarto de officio proconsulis. Si qui certa condicione muneribus vel honoribus se adstrinxerunt, cum alias compelli non possent inviti suscipere istum honorem: fides eis servanda est condicioque, qua ad munera sive honores applicare se passi sunt.
The Same, On the Duties of Proconsul, Book IV. Where persons are obliged to discharge the duties of public employment or office, under a certain condition, when they could not otherwise be compelled to do so against their consent, good faith must be observed by them, and the condition under which they agreed to devote themselves to the exercise of the said employments or office must be complied with.
Dig. 50,6,3Idem ex eodem libro. Impuberes, quamvis necessitas penuriae hominum cogat, ad honores non esse admittendos rescripto ad venidium Rufum legatum Ciliciae declaratur.
Dig. 50,7,7Ulpianus libro quarto de officio proconsulis. Filio propter patrem legationis vacatio ne concedatur, imperator noster cum patre Claudio Callisto rescripsit in haec verba: ‘Quod desideras, ut propter legationem patris tui a legatione tu vaces, in intervallis honorum, qui sumptum habent, recte observatur: in impendiis legationum, quae solo ministerio obeuntur, diversa causa est’.
Ulpianus, On the Duties of Proconsul, Book IV. Exemption from serving as an envoy is not granted to a son on account of the service of his father as one, as our Emperor, with his Father, stated to Claudius Callistus, as follows: “You petition to be exempted from acting as an envoy on account of the service of your father, but this can properly take place only so far as an office which requires the payment of expense is concerned; the rule, however, is different with reference to the expenses of an embassy which demands the service of a single person.”