Ex variis lectionibus libri
Ex libro XI
Dig. 4,8,40Pomponius libro undecimo ex variis lectionibus. Arbiter calendis Ianuariis adesse iussit et ante eum diem decessit: alter ex litigatoribus non adfuit. procul dubio poena minime commissa est: nam et Cassium audisse se dicentem Aristo ait in eo arbitro, qui ipse non venisset, non esse commissam: quemadmodum Servius ait, si per stipulatorem stet, quo minus accipiat, non committi poenam.
Pomponius, Various Extracts, Book XI. An arbiter ordered the parties to appear on the Kalends of January, but died before that day, and one of the parties failed to be present. In this instance there is no question that the penalty was not incurred, for Aristo says that he heard Cassius state that where an arbiter did not himself appear, there was no ground for the payment of the penalty, and Servius also says that if the stipulator is to blame for not receiving the money, no penalty is incurred.
Dig. 7,4,25Pomponius libro undecimo ex variis lectionibus. Placet vel certae partis vel pro indiviso usum fructum non utendo amitti.
Pomponius, Various Passages, Book XI. It is established that an usufruct may be lost by want of use, whether it is that of a share or is undivided.
Dig. 8,6,17Pomponius libro undecimo ex variis lectionibus. Labeo ait, si is, qui haustum habet, per tempus, quo servitus amittitur, ierit ad fontem nec aquam hauserit, iter quoque eum amississe.
Pomponius, Various Passages, Book XI. Labeo says that if anyone who has a right to draw water should, during the time by the lapse of which a servitude is lost, go to a spring but not draw any water, he will lose the right of way also.