Ad edictum praetoris libri
Ex libro V
Dig. 3,1,4Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. item quibus propter infirmitatem curatorem praetor dare solet,
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. Those also, for whom, on account of ill health, the Prætor is accustomed to appoint curators:
Dig. 3,2,5Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. quoniam intellegitur confiteri crimen qui paciscitur.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. This is the case because a man who compromises a crime is considered as having committed it.
Dig. 3,2,7Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. In actionibus, quae ex contractu proficiscuntur, licet famosae sint et damnati notantur, attamen pactus non notatur, merito: quoniam ex his causis non tam turpis est pactio quam ex superioribus.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. In actions arising out of contracts, even though they involve infamy, and those who lose them are branded with it, still, where a party makes an agreement he does not become infamous, and very properly, since a compromise in cases of this kind is not disgraceful, as it is in the preceding ones.
Dig. 3,2,9Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. Uxores viri lugere non compelluntur. 1Sponsi nullus luctus est.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. Husbands are not compelled to mourn for their wives. 1There is no mourning for one betrothed.
Dig. 3,2,12Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. Qui iussu patris duxit, quamvis liberatus potestate patria eam retinuit, non notatur.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. He who marries a woman under such circumstances, by the order of his father, even if he retains her after he is freed from the control of his father, is not branded with infamy.
Dig. 3,2,14Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. Servus, cuius nomine noxale iudicium dominus acceperit, deinde eundem liberum et heredem instituerit, ex eodem iudicio damnatus non est famosus, quia non suo nomine condemnatur: quippe cum initio lis in eum contestata non sit.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. Where a master defended his slave in a noxal action, and afterwards liberated him and made him his heir, and judgment was rendered against the slave in the same action, he does not become infamous, for the reason that he was not condemned on his own account, since in the beginning he was not a party to the joinder of issue.
Dig. 23,1,13Paulus libro quinto ad edictum. Filio familias dissentiente sponsalia nomine eius fieri non possunt.
Paulus, On the Edict, Book V. Where a son under paternal control refuses his consent, a betrothal cannot take place, so far as he is concerned.
Dig. 50,17,109Idem libro quinto ad edictum. Nullum crimen patitur is, qui non prohibet, cum prohibere potest.
The Same, On the Edict, Book V. He is not an accomplice in a crime who does not prevent it from being committed when he is unable to do so.