Responsorum libri
Ex libro I
Dig. 1,18,20Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Legatus Caesaris, id est praeses vel corrector provinciae, abdicando se non amittit imperium.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. The Deputy of the Emperor, that is to say the Governor, or the highest official of a province, does not lose his authority by relinquishing his office.
Dig. 1,22,6Papinianus libro primo responsorum. In consilium curatoris rei publicae vir eiusdem civitatis adsidere non prohibetur, quia publico salario non fruitur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. A citizen of the Republic is not prohibited from acting as assessor in the court of a public official of his own town, because he does not receive a public salary.
Dig. 2,4,14Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Libertus a patrono reus constitutus, qui se defendere paratus pro tribunali praesidem provinciae frequenter interpellat, patronum accusatorem in ius non videtur vocare.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. Where a freedman is accused by his patron, and he, being ready to defend himself, has frequently urged the Governor of the province to hear his case; it is not considered that, by so doing, he has summoned his patron who accused him.
Dig. 2,14,40Idem libro primo responsorum. Tale pactum ‘profiteor te non teneri’ non in personam dirigitur, sed cum generale sit, locum inter heredes quoque litigantes habebit. 1Qui provocavit, pactus est intra diem certum pecunia, qua transegerat, non soluta iudicatis se satisfacturum: iudex appellationis nullo alio de principali causa discusso iustam conventionem velut confessi sequetur. 2Post divisionem bonorum et aeris alieni singuli creditores a singulis heredibus non interpositis delegationibus in solidum, ut convenerat, usuras acceptaverunt: actiones, quas adversus omnes pro partibus habent, impediendae non erunt, si non singuli pro fide rei gestae totum debitum singulis offerant. 3Pater, qui dotem promisit, pactus est, ut post mortem suam in matrimonio sine liberis defuncta filia portio dotis apud heredem suum fratrem remaneret. ea conventio liberis a socero postea susceptis et heredibus testamento relictis per exceptionem doli proderit, cum inter contrahentes id actum sit, ut heredibus consulatur et illo tempore, quo pater alios filios non habuit, in fratrem suum iudicium supremum contulisse videatur.
The Same, Opinions, Book I. A contract stated as follows: “I acknowledge that you are not bound”, is not limited to the person, but, since it is general, it will apply to heirs as well as litigants. 1Where a party who appeared entered into an agreement that, within a certain time, he would satisfy the judgment, if the sum which he agreed to pay by way of compromise was not paid within the time; the appellate judge, without reference to the principal point at issue, shall act upon this as a lawful agreement, just as if the party had admitted his liability. 2After the division of an estate and of its liabilities, where the different creditors have accepted interest from the separate co-heirs for the entire amount of the indebtedness, without any assignment of liabilities, as had been agreed upon; the right of action possessed by the creditors against each heir for his respective share shall not be interfered with, unless the heirs do not offer to pay the entire indebtedness to them, in compliance with the terms of the settlement. 3A father who promised a dowry to his daughter and agreed: “That if she should die after him without leaving any children, a portion of the dowry shall belong to her brother, who will be her heir”. If her father should afterwards have children, and make them heirs by his will, this agreement will give rise to an exception on the ground of fraud, since it was understood between the contracting parties that the heir should be provided for; and, at that time, when the father had no children, he appeared to express his last wishes for the benefit of the brother.
Dig. 3,1,9Idem libro primo responsorum. Ex ea causa prohibitus pro alio postulare, quae infamiam non irrogat ideoque ius pro omnibus postulandi non aufert, in ea tantum provincia pro aliis non recte postulat, in qua praeses fuit qui sententiam dixit, in alia vero non prohibetur, licet eiusdem nominis sit.
The Same, Opinions, Book I. A who is forbidden to appear in behalf of another for a reason which does not imply infamy, and therefore is not deprived of the right of appearing for every one, is only legally excluded from appearing for others in the province over which the Governor who imposed the sentence has jurisdiction; and he is not forbidden to do so in any other, even though it may have the same name.
Dig. 3,2,20Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Ob haec verba sententiae praesidis provinciae ‘callido commento videris accusationis instigator fuisse’ pudor potius oneratur, quam ignominia videtur irrogari: non enim qui exhortatur mandatoris opera fungitur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. A party to whom the following words of a sentence of the Governor of a province were addressed, namely: “You seem to have been the instigator of an accusation by means of a crafty device”; is held to rather cover him with shame than to brand him with ignominy, for he who urges anyone does not perform the functions of a mandator.
Dig. 16,2,17Idem libro primo responsorum. Ideo condemnatus, quod artiorem annonam aedilitatis tempore praebuit, frumentariae pecuniae debitor non videbitur, et ideo compensationem habebit.
Dig. 17,1,55Idem libro primo responsorum. Procurator, qui non res inclusas subtraxit, sed traditas non reddidit, iudicio mandati, non furti tenetur.
Dig. 40,10,1Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Inter ceteros alimenta liberto relicta non idcirco non debentur, quia ius aureorum anulorum ab imperatore libertus acceperit. 1Diversum in eo probatur, qui iudicatus ingenuus conlusione per alium patronum detecta condicioni suae redditus alimenta sibi, quae tertius patronus reliquerat, praeberi desiderat. hunc enim etiam beneficium anulorum amittere placuit.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. Where provision for support is left to a freedman along with several others, he will not cease to be entitled to it because he has obtained from the Emperor the right to wear a gold ring. 1A different opinion prevails in the case of a freedman who has been judicially declared to be freeborn, and has been returned to his former condition through the collusion of another patron, which has been exposed, and who desires to obtain for himself the support that the third patron relinquished; for, in this instance, it has been established that the freedman will forfeit the right to wear a gold ring.
Dig. 47,2,82Idem libro primo responsorum. Ob pecuniam civitati subtractam actione furti, non crimine peculatus tenetur.
Dig. 47,20,1Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Actio stellionatus neque publicis iudiciis neque privatis actionibus continetur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. The action of Stellionatus is not included in public prosecutions or in private actions.
Dig. 50,1,12Idem libro primo responsorum. Et ei contra nominati collegam actionem utilem dari non oportet.
Dig. 50,1,15Idem libro primo responsorum. Ordine decurionum ad tempus motus et in ordinem regressus ad honorem, exemplo relegati, tanto tempore non admittitur, quanto dignitate caruit. sed in utroque placuit examinari, quo crimine damnati sententiam eiusmodi meruerunt: durioribus etenim poenis affectos ignominia velut transacto negotio postea liberari, minoribus vero, quam leges permittunt, subiectos nihilo minus inter infames haberi, cum facti quidem quaestio sit in potestate iudicantium, iuris autem auctoritas non sit. 1In eum, qui successorem suo periculo nominavit, si finito magistratu successor idoneus fuit, actionem dari non oportet. 2In fraudem civilium munerum per tacitam fidem praedia translata fisco vindicantur tantumque alterum interdictae rei minister de suis bonis cogitur solvere. 3Ius originis in honoribus obeundis ac muneribus suscipiendis adoptione non mutatur: sed novis quoque muneribus filius per adoptivum patrem adstringitur.
The Same, Opinions, Book I. He who has been removed from the Order of Decurions for a certain time, and afterwards restored, cannot be admitted to new honors as a person who has been relegated for the time that he was deprived of his rank. It has been decided in both these instances that it must be ascertained whether the parties who have been convicted of an offence deserved a sentence of this kind; for if they received a more severe one than they should have done, or have been branded with infamy, they ought afterwards to be liberated, and the matter be considered as disposed of. When, however, they have been subjected to a less severe penalty than that legally prescribed, they will, nevertheless, be included among persons who are infamous; as a question of fact depends upon the decision of the judge, but the authority of the law does not. 1When anyone appoints a successor to himself, and the latter is solvent when his term of office expires, it is not necessary for an action to be granted. 2Where lands are transferred by means of a secret trust, for the purpose of defrauding public claims, they can be demanded by the Treasury; and the purchaser of the property fraudulently sold will be forced to pay as much again out of his own pocket. 3The right of birth is not altered by adoption, so far as the discharge of official duties and the acceptance of public employment are concerned, for a son can be compelled by his adoptive father to accept a new employment.
Dig. 50,1,17Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Libertus propter patronum a civilibus muneribus non excusatur, nec ad rem pertinet, an operas patrono vel ministerium capto luminibus exhibeat. 1Liberti vero senatorum, qui negotia patronorum gerunt, a tutela decreto patrum excusantur. 2Filium pater decurionem esse voluit: ante filium ex persona sua res publica debet convenire quam patrem ex persona filii. nec ad rem pertinebit, an filius castrense peculium tantum possideat, cum ante militasset vel postea. 3Praescriptio temporum, quae in honoribus repetundis vel aliis suscipiendis data est, apud eosdem servatur, non apud alios. 4Sed eodem tempore non sunt honores in duabus civitatibus ab eodem gerendi: cum simul igitur utrubique deferuntur, potior est originis causa. 5Sola ratio possessionis civilibus possessori muneribus iniungendis citra privilegium specialiter civitati datum idonea non est. 6Postliminio regressi patriae muneribus obtemperare coguntur, quamvis in alienae civitatis finibus consistant. 7Exigendi tributi munus inter sordida munera non habetur et ideo decurionibus quoque mandatur. 8Ex causa fideicommissi manumissus in muneribus civilibus manumissoris originem sequitur, non eius qui libertatem reliquit. 9In adoptiva familia susceptum exemplo dati muneribus civilibus apud originem avi quoque naturalis respondere divo Pio placuit, quamvis in isto fraudis nec suspicio quidem interveniret. 10Error eius, qui se municipem aut colonum existimans munera civilia suscepturum promisit, defensionem iuris non excludit. 11Patris domicilium filium aliorum incolam civilibus muneribus alienae civitatis non adstringit, cum in patris quoque persona domicilii ratio temporaria sit. 12In quaestionibus nominatos capitalium criminum ad novos honores ante causam finitam admitti non oportet: ceterum pristinam interim dignitatem retinent. 13Sola domus possessio, quae in aliena civitate comparatur, domicilium non facit. 14Nominati successoris periculum fideiussorem nominantis non tenet. 15Fideiussores, qui salvam rem publicam fore responderunt, et qui magistratus suo periculo nominant poenalibus actionibus non adstringuntur, in quas inciderunt hi, pro quibus intervenerunt: eos enim damnum rei publicae praestare satis est quod promitti videtur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. A freedman is not excused from civil employment on account of services due to his patron, for it makes no difference whether he renders his services or performs his duties to his patron, or not. 1The freedmen of Senators, however, who transact the business of their patrons, are excused from guardianship by a Decree of the Senate. 2A father consented for his son to be appointed decurion. The government should sue the son personally rather than that the father should have an action brought against him as security for his son; for it does not make any difference whether the son had a castrense peculium before he served in the army or afterwards. 3The prescription of time required in order again to seek office, or to obtain other public employment, applies to some municipalities, but not to others. 4Public employments cannot be administered by the same person at the same time in two different cities. Therefore, where two offices are tendered at the same time, the place of one’s birth should be preferred. 5The sole ground of possession is not sufficient to impose civil duties upon the possessor, unless this privilege was especially granted to the city. 6Persons who have returned to their country under the right of postliminium are obliged to accept public employment, even though they reside in another town. 7The collection of taxes is not included among base employments, and it is therefore committed to decurions. 8He who has been manumitted under the terms of a trust, in the matter of civil employments, follows the origin of the person who manumitted him, and not that of him who left him his freedom. 9It was decided by the Divine Pius that a child born in an adopted family followed the origin of his natural grandfather in the discharge of civil employments; just as where a son was given in adoption, unless there was some suspicion of fraud attaching to the proceeding. 10The mistake of him who, thinking that he is a citizen of a town, or the inhabitant of a colony, agrees to accept civil employment, does not exclude him from making a legal defence. 11The removal of the domicile of a father to another town does not compel his son to accept public employment in that town, when the cause for the change of the father’s domicile is temporary. 12Where accusations of a capital crime are brought against persons nominated for office, they cannot be admitted to any new employments before their cases have been disposed of, but, in the meantime, they will retain their former rank. 13The mere possession of a house in another town does not create a domicile. 14The responsibility entailed by the nomination of a successor does not bind the surety of the person who makes it. 15Sureties who have become responsible for public property, and who nominate magistrates at their own risk, are not liable to any penal actions which may be brought against those for whom they have become bound; for it is enough that they should have promised to make good any damage sustained by the government.
Dig. 50,2,6Idem libro primo responsorum. Spurii decuriones fiunt: et ideo fieri poterit ex incesto quoque natus: non enim impedienda est dignitas eius qui nihil admisit. 1Minores viginti quinque annorum decuriones facti sportulas decurionum accipiunt: sed interim suffragium inter ceteros ferre non possunt. 2Decurio etiam suae civitatis vectigalia exercere prohibetur. 3Qui iudicii publici quaestionem citra veniam abolitionis deseruerunt, decurionum honore decorari non possunt, cum ex Turpilliano senatus consulto notentur ignominia veluti calumniae causa iudicio publico damnati. 4Pater, qui filio decurione creato provocavit, etsi praescriptione temporis exclusus fuerit, si quod gestum est non habuit ratum, muneribus civilibus pro filio non tenebitur. 5Privilegiis cessantibus ceteris eorum causa potior habetur in sententiis ferendis, qui pluribus eodem tempore suffragiis iure decurionis decorati sunt. sed et qui plures liberos habet, in suo collegio primus sententiam rogatur ceterosque honoris ordine praecellit.
The Same, Opinions, Book I. Illegitimate children, as well as those sprung from incestuous marriages, can become decurions; for he should not be excluded from office who has committed no crime. 1Minors under the age of twenty-five years, who have been created decurions, receive the salary attached to the office, but they cannot vote with the others. 2A decurion is forbidden to hold the office of farmer of the revenue, even in his own city. 3Those who abandon a public prosecution, without obtaining permission to do so, cannot be decorated with the honor of decurion; for, in accordance with the Turpillian Decree of the Senate, they are branded with infamy as persons who have been convicted of malicious prosecution in a criminal case. 4A son, having been created decurion, his father appealed, and although his appeal was dismissed because it had not been filed within the prescribed time, if the son assumed the office, and the father did not ratify his acts, he would not be liable for his son. 5When other questions relating to privilege are to be decided, those who have obtained the most votes at the same time for the office of decurion shall be entitled to the preference; but he who has the largest number of children shall be first asked for his opinion in the assembly, and precede the others in point of honor.
Dig. 50,5,8Idem libro primo responsorum. In honoribus delatis neque maior annis septuaginta neque pater numero quinque liberorum excusatur. sed in Asia sacerdotium provinciae suscipere non coguntur numero liberorum quinque subnixi: quod optimus maximusque princeps noster Severus Augustus decrevit ac postea in ceteris provinciis servandum esse constituit. 1Non alios fisci vectigalium redemptores a muneribus civilibus ac tutelis excusari placuit, quam eos, qui praesentes negotium exercerent. 2Vacationum privilegia non spectant liberos veteranorum. 3Qui muneris publici vacationem habet, per magistratus ex inproviso collationes indictas recte recusat: eas vero, quae e lege fiunt, recusare non debet. 4Philosophis, qui se frequentes atque utiles per eandem studiorum sectam contendentibus praebent, tutelas, item munera sordida corporalia remitti placuit, non ea, quae sumptibus expediuntur: etenim vere philosophantes pecuniam contemnunt, cuius retinendae cupidine fictam adseverationem detegunt. 5Qui maximos principes appellavit et causam propriam acturus Romam profectus est: quoad cognitio finem accipiat, ab honoribus et civilibus muneribus apud suos excusatur.
The Same, Opinions, Book I. When a person is appointed to municipal honors, neither the age of seventy years, nor the fact that he is the father of five children, can be advanced as an excuse. Our Great Emperor Severus decreed that in Asia, men who had five children could not be compelled to assume the sacerdotal duties of the province, and he afterwards decided that this rule should be observed in the other provinces. 1It is settled that no other farmers of the revenue except those who are engaged in that occupation at the time can be excused from civil employments and guardianships. 2The privileges of exemption do not apply to the children of veterans. 3Those who have obtained exemption from public employments are not compelled to pay contributions unexpectedly imposed upon them by magistrates, but they cannot avoid paying those which are imposed by law. 4It has been decided that philosophers, who frequently and usefully employ their time for the benefit of those who are pursuing the studies of their school, are excused from guardianships and other employments requiring corporeal exertion, but they are not excused from those which involve the payment of expenses; for true philosophers despise money, and expose the false statements of the philosophical impostors who are desirous of having it. 5Anyone who has appealed to the Emperor, and goes to Rome with the intention of conducting his own lawsuit, is excused from municipal honors and employments until his case has been decided.
Dig. 50,7,8Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Filius decurio pro patre legationis officium suscepit. ea res filium, quo minus ordine suo legatus proficiscatur, non excusat: pater tamen biennii vacationem vindicare poterit, quia per filium legatione functus videtur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. A son, who was a decurion, assumed the duties of a envoy in behalf of his father. This will not excuse him from another embassy, unless he has already departed; the father, however, can claim exemption for two years, for the reason that he is considered to have discharged the duties of his mission by his son.
Dig. 50,7,14Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Vicarius alieni muneris voluntate sua datus ordine suo legationem suscipere non admissa biennii praescriptione cogetur.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. A substitute, appointed with his own consent to discharge the duties of another, is not entitled to the privilege of exemption for two years, and is compelled to accept the office of envoy.
Dig. 50,8,4Papinianus libro primo responsorum. Curatores communis officii divisa pecunia, quam omnibus in solidum publice dari placuit, periculo vice mutua non liberantur. Ulpianus: prior tamen exemplo tutorum conveniendus est is qui gessit.
Papinianus, Opinions, Book I. Where certain officials, who held office together, divided money among themselves which had been paid to them all in a single sum, it was decided that they could not be released from responsibility by paying the amount which each had respectively received. Ulpianus, however, who transacted the business, should be first sued, as in the case of guardians.
Dig. 50,8,5Idem ex eodem libro. Praedium publicum in quinque annos idonea cautione non exacta curator rei publicae locavit. ceteris annis colonus si reliqua traxerit et de fructibus praedii mercedesque servari non potuerint, successor qui locavit tenebitur. idem in vectigalibus non ita pridem constitutum est, scilicet ut sui temporis singuli periculum praestarent. 1In eum, qui administrationis tempore creditoribus rei publicae novatione facta pecuniam cavit, post depositum officium actionem denegari non oportet. diversa causa est eius, qui solvi constituit: similis etenim videtur ei, qui publice vendidit aut locavit. 2Filium pro patre curatore rei publicae creato cavere cogi non oportet. nec mutat, quod in eum pater emancipatum, priusquam curator constitueretur, partem bonorum suorum donationis causa contulit. 3Pro magistratu fideiussor interrogatus pignora quoque specialiter dedit. in eum casum pignora videntur data, quo recte convenitur: videlicet postquam res ab eo servari non potuerit, pro quo intercessit.
The Same, In The Same Book. The magistrate of a city leased public land for five years without requiring good security. The tenant, having remained a longer time than the five years, left a balance due to the Treasury, and as the proceeds of the crops of the land could not be obtained, the successor of the person who leased the land was held responsible. The same rule was long since decided not to apply to taxes, as those who farm them are only liable during their term of office. 1An action should not be refused against anyone after his retirement from office who, during his term, became responsible through novation to the creditors of the State. The case of one who agreed to pay is, however, different, for he is considered to resemble a person who either publicly sold or leased property. 2A son cannot be required to be responsible for his father, who has been created a magistrate, even if his father emancipated him before he was appointed to office, or where he has transferred to him a portion of his property as a donation. 3When a surety who appeared for a magistrate has also given pledges, the pledges are considered to have been furnished in order that suit may properly be brought; that is to say, after nothing can be recovered from him for whom he became liable.