Fideicommissorum libri
Ex libro V
Dig. 36,1,67Idem libro quinto fideicommissorum. Servo invito domino vel ignorante non recte restituetur hereditas: sed si postea ratum habuerit, confirmabitur restitutio, verum ipsi domino adquirentur actiones. nec quia hereditatis adquisitionis similis est haec restitutio, iussum praecedere oportet, sed ut dictum est, etiam ratihabitio subsequi poterit exemplo bonorum possessionis. neque interest, quod ad propositum attinet, ipsi domino an servo quis rogetur restituere hereditatem, nec in ea re consensu aut opera servi opus est: atquin in bonorum possessione vel in adeunda hereditate consensus eius necessarius est. itaque si qui suspectam dicent hereditatem, postulante domino compellendi erunt adire et restituere hereditatem. 1Si testator rogasset heredem, ut restituat hereditatem mulieri, si non nupsisset, dicendum erit compellendum heredem, si suspectam dicat hereditatem, adire et restituere eam mulieri, etiamsi nupsisset. idem in ceteris quoque condicionibus Iulianus noster probat, quae similiter nisi fine vitae expleri non possent. secundum quam sententiam cautione praestita his, quorum interest, ab his, quibus restitui sub isdem condicionibus heres rogatus esset, restituet hereditatem. 2Cum praetor cognita causa per errorem vel etiam ambitiose iuberet hereditatem ut ex fideicommisso restitui, etiam publice interest restitui propter rerum iudicatarum auctoritatem. 3Si pupillo infanti restituere hereditatem quis rogatus sit, si sponte adierit, etiam servo eius et ipsi pupillo tutore auctore restituetur hereditas: si quidem eo, quod fari non potest, non magis ea res impedietur, quam in muto pubere volente sibi restitui hereditatem. si autem heres recuset adire hereditatem, quemadmodum res expediri possit, difficile est, quia neque tutore desiderante periculo pupilli adiri hereditatem Trebelliano senatus consulto locus sit futurus neque pupillus ipse id desiderare possit, cum fari non possit. quod aliquatenus circa mutos expediri potest, nam si auditus capaces sunt vel interrogati nutu possint significare velle se periculo suo hereditatem adire, quomodo absentes per nuntium. sed et infanti non dubito omnimodo subveniendum idque ex similitudine iuris civilis vel honorarii constituendum est: sive enim heres institutus esset, non dubie pro herede tutore auctore gerere posse videtur, sive de bonorum possessione agitaretur, peti ei per tutorem posset. ideoque et heres compelli per tutorem potest adire et restituere hereditatem. quo exemplo et mutus, qui nihil intellegere potest, per curatorem adiuvatur. 4Si singulae res ab herede traditae sunt iussu meo ei cui eas vendiderim, non dubitabimus mihi intellegi factam restitutionem. idem erit, et si iussu meo tradantur, cui ego ex fideicommisso aliave qua causa eas praestare debuerim vel in creditum ire vel donare voluerim.
The Same, Trusts, Book V. Ad Dig. 36,1,67 pr.Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. III, § 596, Note 11.An estate cannot legally be transferred to a slave, if his master is unwilling or not informed of the fact, but if he afterwards ratifies the transfer, it will be confirmed, and the rights of action will be acquired by the master himself, not for the reason that this transfer resembles the acquisition of the estate, and that the order of the master must precede it, but, as has already been stated, the subsequent ratification can be made just as in the case of the possession of property under the Prætorian Law. Nor does it make any difference, in the present instance, whether the master himself or his slave is charged to transfer his estate, nor is the consent nor the agency of the slave required but his consent is necessary where prætorian possession of the property is demanded, or an estate is to be accepted. Therefore, where heirs allege that they think an estate is insolvent, on the application of the master they can be compelled to enter upon and transfer it. 1Where a testator charges his heir to transfer his estate to a woman, if she does not marry, it must be held that if the heir alleges that he suspects the estate of being insolvent, he can be compelled to accept and transfer it to the woman, even if she should marry. Our Julianus adopts this view with reference to other conditions which, in like manner, cannot be fulfilled except at the termination of life. In accordance with this opinion, a bond should be furnished by those to whom the heir has been charged to transfer the estate under similar conditions, to deliver it to the persons to whom it will belong if the condition should not be complied with. 2If the Prætor, after proper investigation, should, either through mistake or partiality, order an estate to be transferred as due under a trust, it is to the interest of the community that it should be transferred, on account of the authority which invests judicial decisions. 3Where anyone is charged to transfer an estate to a ward who is not old enough to talk, and he voluntarily enters upon said estate, it can be transferred either to the slave of the ward, or to the ward himself, with the authority of his guardian; and the incapacity of the child to speak is no more an impediment to the transaction than exists in the case where a mute, who has reached the age of puberty, desires an estate to be delivered to him. If, however, the heir refuses to enter upon the estate, it is difficult to decide how the matter can be settled, because there will be no ground for the application of the Trebellian Decree of the Senate if the guardian should ask that the estate be accepted at the risk of his ward; nor can the ward ask that this be done, as he does not possess the faculty of speech. This question may be more easily solved in the case of persons who are dumb, for if they are interrogated and can hear, they can indicate by a nod that they are willing to accept the estate at their own risk, just as persons who are absent can give their consent by a messenger. However, I have no doubt that relief ought to be granted the child, and that this rule should be established on account of the resemblance between the Civil and the Prætorian Law. But if the said ward should be appointed heir, there is no doubt that he can act as such under the authority of his guardian; or, where a question arises with reference to obtaining possession of an estate under the Prætorian Law, he can claim it by his guardian; hence if appointed heir, he can be compelled by his guardian to enter upon and transfer the estate. In the same manner, a person who is dumb and destitute of understanding can be assisted by his curator. 4Where property is delivered by the heir, on my order, to the person to whom I have sold it, there is no doubt that the transfer should be considered to have been made to me as the beneficiary of the trust. The same rule will apply if, by my order, the property is delivered to anyone to whom I would be obliged to deliver it under the terms of a trust, or for any other reason; or to one to whom I intended to lend it, or give it.