Digestorum libri
Ex libro VIII
Dig. 18,1,59Celsus libro octavo digestorum. Cum venderes fundum, non dixisti ‘ita ut optimus maximusque’: verum est, quod Quinto Mucio placebat, non liberum, sed qualis esset, fundum praestari oportere. idem et in urbanis praediis dicendum est.
Celsus, Digest, Book VIII. When you sell a tract of land and do not state that it is in the very best possible condition, the opinion held by Quintus Mucius is correct, namely, that the vendor must deliver the property not free from all encumbrances, but as it was at the time. The same must be said to apply to urban estates.
Dig. 19,1,38Celsus libro octavo digestorum. Si venditor hominis dixit peculium eum habere decem nec quemquam adempturum, et si plus habet, totum praestet, nisi hoc actum est, ut dumtaxat decem praestaret, si minus est, praestet esse decem et talem servum esse, ut tantum peculii habeat. 1Si per emptorem steterit, quo minus ei mancipium traderetur, pro cibariis per arbitrium indemnitatem posse servari Sextus Aelius, Drusus dixerunt, quorum et mihi iustissima videtur esse sententia. 2Firmus a Proculo quaesiit, si de plumbeo castello fistulae sub terram missae aquam ducerent in aenum lateribus circumstructum, an hae aedium essent, an ut ruta caesa vincta fixaque quae aedium non essent. ille rescripsit referre, quid acti esset. quid ergo si nihil de ea re neque emptor neque venditor cogitaverunt, ut plerumque in eiusmodi rebus evenisse solet, nonne propius est, ut inserta et inclusa aedificio partem eius esse existimemus?
Celsus, Digest, Book VIII. Where the vendor of a slave stated that his peculium consisted of ten aurei, that he would not deprive him of any of it, and that if it included more, he would surrender it all; if it is more than that, he must give it all, unless the intention was that he should only deliver the ten aurei; if it is less than that, he must pay the ten, and give a slave who is possessed of a peculium of that amount. 1Where the purchaser is to blame for the non-delivery of the slave to himself, Sextus Ælius and Drusus have stated that he can be compelled by arbitration to indemnify the vendor for the maintenance of the slave; and this opinion appears to me to be perfectly just. 2Firmus asked of Proculus whether the pipes which conduct water from a leaden reservoir under ground into a brazen vessel built around the sides of a house are to be considered part of the latter? Or are they to be considered as personal property, united and stationary, which do not belong to the house? He answered that the intention of the parties should be taken into account. But what if neither the purchaser nor the vendor had paid any attention to the subject, as very frequently occurs in cases of this kind? Would it not seem to be better if we should hold that what is inserted and enclosed in a building forms a portion of the same?
Dig. 19,5,2Celsus libro octavo digestorum. (nam cum deficiant vulgaria atque usitata actionum nomina, praescriptis verbis agendum est)
Dig. 50,17,185Idem libro octavo digestorum. Inpossibilium nulla obligatio est.