Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. XLVIII1,
De publicis iudiciis
Liber quadragesimus octavus
I.

De publicis iudiciis

(On Criminal Prosecutions.)

1Ma­cer li­bro pri­mo de pu­bli­cis iu­di­ciis. Non om­nia iu­di­cia, in qui­bus cri­men ver­ti­tur, et pu­bli­ca sunt, sed ea tan­tum, quae ex le­gi­bus iu­di­cio­rum pu­bli­co­rum ve­niunt, ut Iu­lia ma­ies­ta­tis, Iu­lia de ad­ul­te­riis, Cor­ne­lia de si­ca­riis et ve­ne­fi­cis, Pom­peia par­ri­ci­dii, Iu­lia pe­cu­la­tus, Cor­ne­lia de tes­ta­men­tis, Iu­lia de vi pri­va­ta, Iu­lia de vi pu­bli­ca, Iu­lia amb­itus, Iu­lia re­pe­tun­da­rum, Iu­lia de an­no­na.

1Macer, On Criminal Prosecutions, Book I. All cases in which crime is involved are not public, but only those which are derived from the laws relating to the prosecution of crimes, such as the Julian Law on Treason; the Julian Law on Adultery; the Cornelian Law on Assassins and Poisoners; the Pompeian Law on Parricide; the Julian Law on Peculation; the Cornelian Law on Wills; the Julian Law on Private Violence; the Julian Law on Public Violence; the Julian Law on the Bribery of Voters; the Julian Law on Extortion; and the Julian Law on Raising the Price of Food.

2Pau­lus li­bro quin­to de­ci­mo ad edic­tum prae­to­ris. Pu­bli­co­rum iu­di­cio­rum quae­dam ca­pi­ta­lia sunt, quae­dam non ca­pi­ta­lia. ca­pi­ta­lia sunt, ex qui­bus poe­na mors aut ex­ilium est, hoc est aquae et ig­nis in­ter­dic­tio: per has enim poe­nas ex­imi­tur ca­put de ci­vi­ta­te. nam ce­te­ra non ex­ilia, sed rele­ga­tio­nes pro­prie di­cun­tur: tunc enim ci­vi­tas re­ti­ne­tur. non ca­pi­ta­lia sunt, ex qui­bus pe­cu­nia­ria aut in cor­pus ali­qua co­er­ci­tio poe­na est.

2Paulus, On the Edict of the Prætor, Book XV. Some criminal offences are capital, and some are not. Those which are capital entail the punishment of exile or banishment; that is to say, the interdiction of water and fire. For, by these penalties the civil rights of the delinquent are lost, for the other penalties are properly termed relegation and not exile, for then the rights of citizenship are retained. Punishments which are not capital are those where the penalty is either pecuniary or corporeal.

3Ul­pia­nus li­bro tri­gen­si­mo quin­to ad Sa­binum. Pu­bli­ca ac­cu­sa­tio reo vel rea an­te de­func­tis per­mit­ti­tur.

3Ulpianus, On Sabinus, Book XXXV. A criminal prosecution is annulled by the death of the defendant of either sex.

4Pau­lus li­bro tri­gen­si­mo sep­ti­mo ad edic­tum. In­ter­dum eve­nit, ut prae­iu­di­cium iu­di­cio pu­bli­co fiat, sic­ut in ac­tio­ne le­gis Aqui­liae et fur­ti et vi bo­no­rum rap­to­rum et in­ter­dic­to un­de vi et de ta­bu­lis tes­ta­men­ti ex­hi­ben­dis: nam in his de re fa­mi­lia­ri agi­tur.

4Paulus, On the Edict, Book XXXVII. It sometimes happens that a criminal prosecution is prejudiced, as in the action under the Aquilian Law; in the action of theft, and the one for property taken by violence; in the interdict Unde vi and in that to compel the production of a will; for in these cases private matters are concerned.

5Ul­pia­nus li­bro oc­ta­vo dis­pu­ta­tio­num. Is qui reus fac­tus est pur­ga­re se de­bet nec an­te pot­est ac­cu­sa­re, quam fue­rit ex­cu­sa­tus: con­sti­tu­tio­ni­bus enim ob­ser­va­tur, ut non re­la­tio­ne cri­mi­num, sed in­no­cen­tia reus pur­ge­tur. 1Il­lud in­cer­tum est, utrum ita de­mum ac­cu­sa­re pot­est, si fue­rit li­be­ra­tus, an et si poe­nam sub­ie­rit: est enim con­sti­tu­tum ab im­pe­ra­to­re nos­tro et di­vo pa­tre eius post dam­na­tio­nem ac­cu­sa­tio­nem quem in­choare non pos­se. sed hoc pu­to ad eos de­mum per­ti­ne­re, qui vel ci­vi­ta­tem vel li­ber­ta­tem amis­e­runt. 2In­choa­tas pla­ne de­la­tio­nes an­te dam­na­tio­nem im­ple­re eis et post dam­na­tio­nem per­mis­sum est.

5Ulpianus, Disputations, Book VIII. When anyone is accused of crime, he must prove that he is not guilty, and he cannot accuse another before he himself has been acquitted; for it is set forth in the Imperial Constitutions that a defendant must be cleared, not by accusing others of crime, but by his own innocence. 1It is uncertain whether anyone can bring an accusation when he has been discharged, or when he has suffered punishment; for it was decided by our Emperor and his Divine Father that he could not begin an accusation after having been condemned. I think, however, that this only refers to those who have either lost their right to citizenship or their freedom. 2It is clear that accusations which have been begun before conviction can be completed afterwards.

6Mar­cia­nus li­bro quar­to de­ci­mo in­sti­tu­tio­num. De­func­to eo, qui reus fuit cri­mi­nis, et poe­na ex­tinc­ta in qua­cum­que cau­sa cri­mi­nis ex­tinc­ti de­bet is co­gnos­ce­re, cu­ius de pe­cu­nia­ria re co­gni­tio est.

6Marcianus, Institutes, Book XIV. Where a person who was accused of crime dies, and the penalty is extinguished, no matter in what condition the accusation of the extinguished crime may be, the magistrate who has jurisdiction of the pecuniary interest involved can proceed with the investigation.

7Ma­cer li­bro se­cun­do iu­di­cio­rum pu­bli­co­rum. In­fa­mem non ex om­ni cri­mi­ne sen­ten­tia fa­cit, sed ex eo, quod iu­di­cii pu­bli­ci cau­sam ha­buit. ita­que ex eo cri­mi­ne, quod iu­di­cii pu­bli­ci non fuit, dam­na­tum in­fa­mia non se­que­tur, ni­si id cri­men ex ea ac­tio­ne fuit, quae et­iam in pri­va­to iu­di­cio in­fa­miam con­dem­na­to im­por­tat, vel­uti fur­ti, vi bo­no­rum rap­to­rum, in­iu­ria­rum.

7Macer, Public Prosecutions, Book II. A sentence for every crime does not render a man infamous, but only such as have the character of public prosecutions. Hence infamy does not result from condemnation for a crime which is not the subject of public prosecution, unless the offence can be the subject of an action which, even in the case of a private judgment, brands the condemned party with infamy, as for instance, that of theft, that of robbery with violence, and that of injury.

8Pau­lus li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de iu­di­ciis pu­bli­cis. Or­do ex­er­cen­do­rum pu­bli­co­rum ca­pi­ta­lium in usu es­se de­siit, du­ran­te ta­men poe­na le­gum, cum ex­tra or­di­nem cri­mi­na pro­ban­tur.

8Paulus, Public Prosecutions. The order of conducting public prosecutions for capital offence is no longer in use; still the penalty prescribed by the laws exists, and the crimes are proved arbitrarily.

9Mar­cia­nus li­bro pri­mo de iu­di­ciis pu­bli­cis. Scien­dum est, si in ca­pi­ta­li cau­sa suum ser­vum reum cri­mi­ne fac­tum quis non de­fen­de­rit, non eum pro de­relic­to ha­be­ri, et id­eo, si ab­so­lu­tus fue­rit, non li­be­rum fie­ri, sed ma­ne­re do­mi­ni.

9Marcianus, On Public Prosecutions, Book I. It must be remembered that if anyone should not defend his own slave, when he is accused of a capital crime, he will not be considered as having abandoned him; and therefore if the slave should be acquitted, he will not become free, but will still remain the property of his master.

10Pa­pi­nia­nus li­bro se­cun­do de­fi­ni­tio­num. In­ter ac­cu­sa­to­rem et reum co­gni­tio­ne sus­cep­ta ex­cu­sa­tio pro ab­sen­te ius­tis ra­tio­ni­bus ad­mit­ti­tur: nec per tri­duum per sin­gu­los dies ter ci­ta­tus reus dam­ne­tur vel de ac­cu­sa­to­ris ab­sen­tis prae­sen­te reo ca­lum­nia pro­nun­tie­tur.

10Papinianus, Definitions, Book II. While the case between the accuser and the defendant is pending in court, the excuse of absence for good reasons is admitted; and although the defendant may have been called three times a day for three days, he should not be condemned; or if the accuser should be absent and the defendant present, the former ought not be convicted of malicious prosecution.

11Mae­cia­nus li­bro de­ci­mo de iu­di­ciis pu­bli­cis. Ser­vus per pro­cu­ra­to­rem do­mi­ni ae­que ac per do­mi­num de­fen­di pot­est.

11Marcianus, On Public Prosecutions, Book X. A slave can be defended by an attorney appointed by his master, just as well as by his master himself.

12Mo­des­ti­nus li­bro ter­tio de poe­nis. Cus­to­dias au­di­tu­rus tam cla­ris­si­mos vi­ros quam pa­tro­nos cau­sa­rum, si om­nes in ci­vi­ta­te pro­vin­ciae quam re­git agunt, ad­hi­be­re de­bet. 1Et fe­ria­tis die­bus cus­to­dias au­di­ri pos­se re­scrip­tum est, ita ut in­no­xios di­mit­tat et no­cen­tes, qui du­rio­rem anim­ad­ver­sio­nem ind­igent, dif­fe­rat.

12Modestinus, On Punishments, Book III. The magistrate who is about to hear the cases of prisoners should invoke the aid of the most illustrious citizens, as well as of the most eminent advocates, if they all reside in the principal city of the province where he exercises jurisdiction. 1It is provided by a rescript that prisoners can be examined even on feast days, so that he may dismiss such as are innocent, and continue the cases of those who are guilty, and deserve severe punishment.

13Pa­pi­nia­nus li­bro quin­to de­ci­mo re­spon­so­rum. Ac­cu­sa­to­re de­func­to res ab alio, iu­di­can­te prae­si­de pro­vin­ciae, per­agi pot­est. 1Ad cri­men iu­di­cii pu­bli­ci per­se­quen­dum frus­tra pro­cu­ra­tor in­ter­ve­nit, mul­to­que ma­gis ad de­fen­den­dum: sed ex­cu­sa­tio­nes ab­sen­tium ex se­na­tus con­sul­to iu­di­ci­bus al­le­gan­tur et, si ius­tam ra­tio­nem ha­beant, sen­ten­tia dif­fer­tur.

13Papinianus, Opinions, Book XV. If the accuser should die, the case can be prosecuted by another, if the Governor of the province considers this advisable. 1An agent will intervene to no purpose in the prosecution of a crime; and this applies still more forcibly to the defence. The excuses of absent persons can be presented to the judges in accordance with the terms of the Decree of the Senate, and if good reasons are given, the decision will be postponed.

14Idem li­bro sex­to de­ci­mo re­spon­so­rum. Ge­ne­ri ser­vis a so­ce­ro ve­ne­fi­cii ac­cu­sa­tis prae­ses pro­vin­ciae pa­trem ca­lum­niam in­tu­lis­se pro­nun­tia­ve­rat. in­ter in­fa­mes pa­trem de­func­tae non ha­ben­dum re­spon­di, quon­iam et si pu­bli­cum iu­di­cium in­ter li­be­ros de mor­te fi­liae con­sti­tis­set, ci­tra pe­ri­cu­lum pa­ter vin­di­ca­re­tur.

14The Same, Opinions, Book XVI. The slaves of a son-in-law having been accused by his father-in-law of administering poison, the Governor of the province decided that the father had been guilty of malicious prosecution. I gave it as my opinion that the father of the deceased should not be included among persons who are infamous, since although a criminal prosecution might be instituted by the children for the death of the daughter, the father could bring the accusation without any risk.