Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. XLIV1,
De exceptionibus praescriptionibus et praeiudiciis
Liber quadragesimus quartus
I.

De exceptionibus praescriptionibus et praeiudiciis

(Concerning Exceptions, Prescriptions, and Preliminary Inquiries.)

1Ul­pia­nus li­bro quar­to ad edic­tum. Age­re et­iam is vi­de­tur, qui ex­cep­tio­ne uti­tur: nam reus in ex­cep­tio­ne ac­tor est.

1Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book IV. He is held to occupy the position of plaintiff who makes use of an exception, for where a defendant has recourse to an exception he becomes a plaintiff.

2Idem li­bro sep­tua­gen­si­mo quar­to ad edic­tum. Ex­cep­tio dic­ta est qua­si quae­dam ex­clu­sio, quae op­po­ni ac­tio­ni cu­ius­que rei so­let ad ex­clu­den­dum id, quod in in­ten­tio­nem con­dem­na­tio­nem­ve de­duc­tum est. 1Re­pli­ca­tio­nes ni­hil aliud sunt quam ex­cep­tio­nes, et a par­te ac­to­ris ve­niunt: quae qui­dem id­eo ne­ces­sa­riae sunt, ut ex­cep­tio­nes ex­clu­dant: sem­per enim re­pli­ca­tio id­cir­co ob­ici­tur, ut ex­cep­tio­nem op­pug­net. 2Il­lud te­nen­dum est om­nem ex­cep­tio­nem vel re­pli­ca­tio­nem ex­clu­so­riam es­se: ex­cep­tio ac­to­rem ex­clu­dit, re­pli­ca­tio reum. 3Sed et con­tra re­pli­ca­tio­nem so­let da­ri tri­pli­ca­tio, et con­tra tri­pli­ca­tio­nem rur­sus et de­in­ceps mul­ti­pli­can­tur no­mi­na, dum aut reus aut ac­tor ob­icit. 4Sa­ne so­le­mus di­ce­re quas­dam ex­cep­tio­nes es­se di­la­to­rias, quas­dam per­emp­to­rias: ut pu­ta di­la­to­ria est ex­cep­tio, quae dif­fert ac­tio­nem, vel­uti pro­cu­ra­to­ria ex­cep­tio di­la­to­ria est: nam qui di­cit non li­ce­re pro­cu­ra­to­rio no­mi­ne agi, non pror­sus li­tem in­fi­tia­tur, sed per­so­nam evi­tat.

2The Same, On the Edict, Book LXXIV. An exception is so called for the reason that it operates as an exclusion, and is ordinarily opposed to proceedings to collect a claim, for the purpose of barring the statement of the same as well as judgment in favor of the party who brings the suit. 1Replications are nothing more than exceptions pleaded by the party plaintiff, which are necessary in order to bar exceptions; for a replication is always introduced for the purpose of opposing an exception. 2It must be remembered that every exception, or replication, is for the purpose of preventing the opposite party from proceeding further. An exception bars the plaintiff, and a replication bars the defendant. 3It is customary for a triplication to be granted against the replication, and other pleas to follow in order and, after this, the names are multiplied, whether the defendant or the plaintiff interposes an objection. 4We usually say that some exceptions are dilatory, and others peremptory; as, for instance, a dilatory exception is one which postpones the action, thus one denying the authority of an agent is a dilatory exception. For he who alleges that anyone has not the power to act as an attorney does not deny that the action should be brought, but maintains that the person who brings it is not qualified to do so.

3Gaius li­bro pri­mo ad edic­tum pro­vin­cia­le. Ex­cep­tio­nes aut per­pe­tuae et per­emp­to­riae sunt aut tem­po­ra­les et di­la­to­riae. per­pe­tuae at­que per­emp­to­riae sunt, quae sem­per lo­cum ha­bent nec evi­ta­ri pos­sunt, qua­lis est do­li ma­li et rei iu­di­ca­tae et si quid con­tra le­gem se­na­tus­ve con­sul­tum fac­tum es­se di­ce­tur, item pac­ti con­ven­ti per­pe­tui, id est ne om­ni­no pe­cu­nia pe­ta­tur. tem­po­ra­les at­que di­la­to­riae sunt, quae non sem­per lo­cum ha­bent, sed evi­ta­ri pos­sunt, qua­lis est pac­ti con­ven­ti tem­po­ra­lis, id est ne for­te in­tra quin­quen­nium age­re­tur: pro­cu­ra­to­riae quo­que ex­cep­tio­nes di­la­to­riae sunt, quae evi­ta­ri pos­sunt.

3Gaius, On the Provincial Edict, Book I. Exceptions are either perpetual and peremptory, or temporary and dilatory. Those are perpetual and peremptory which will always lie, and cannot be avoided; for example, those based on fraud and res judicata, and where anything is alleged to have been done against the laws or decrees of the Senate; also such as are applicable in the case of an informal agreement, that is to say, such as provide that the money due shall, under no circumstances, be collected. Exceptions are temporary and dilatory which cannot be brought at any time, and can be avoided; and of this description is a temporary agreement between the parties under which an action cannot be brought for a specified period, for instance, within five years. Exceptions by which the action of an agent is barred, and which can be avoided, are also dilatory.

4Pau­lus li­bro vi­cen­si­mo ad edic­tum. In pu­pil­lo, cui so­lu­ta est de­bi­ta pe­cu­nia si­ne tu­to­ris auc­to­ri­ta­te, si quae­ra­tur, an do­li ex­cep­tio­ne sum­mo­ve­ri de­beat, il­lud tem­pus in­spi­ci­tur, an pe­cu­niam vel ex ea ali­quid ha­beat, quo pe­tit.

4Paulus, On the Edict, Book XX. If the question is asked whether a ward can be barred by an exception on the ground of fraud, where money which was due to him has been paid without the authority of his guardian, and he demands payment a second time, it must be ascertained whether, when he makes the demand, he still has the money, or has purchased something with it.

5Idem li­bro oc­ta­vo de­ci­mo ad edic­tum. Is, qui di­cet11Die Großausgabe liest di­cit statt di­cet. se iu­ras­se, pot­est et aliis ex­cep­tio­ni­bus uti cum ex­cep­tio­ne iu­ris­iu­ran­di vel aliis so­lis: plu­ri­bus enim de­fen­sio­ni­bus uti per­mit­ti­tur.

5The Same, On the Edict, Book XVIII. A defendant who alleges that he has already sworn in court that he does not owe the money for which he is sued, can avail himself of all other exceptions in addition to that based on taking the oath, or of the rest of them without it; for he is permitted to make use of several defences.

6Idem li­bro sep­tua­gen­si­mo pri­mo ad edic­tum. Si rem le­ga­tam pe­tat le­ga­ta­rius, de do­lo tes­ta­to­ris ex­ci­pi­tur: nam sic­ut he­res, qui in uni­ver­sum ius suc­ce­dit, sum­mo­ve­tur ex­cep­tio­ne, ita et le­ga­ta­rius de­bet sum­mo­ve­ri qua­si unius rei suc­ces­sor.

6The Same, On the Edict, Book LXXI. If a legatee brings an action to recover the property bequeathed, an exception based on the fraud of the testator can be pleaded against him; for, just as an heir who succeeds to the entire estate can be barred by an exception, so a legatee can also be barred as the successor of an individual part of the same.

7Idem li­bro ter­tio ad Plau­tium. Ex­cep­tio­nes, quae per­so­nae cu­ius­que co­hae­rent, non trans­eunt ad alios, vel­uti ea quam so­cius ha­bet ex­cep­tio­nem ‘quod fa­ce­re pos­sit’, vel pa­rens pa­tro­nus­ve, non com­pe­tit fi­de­ius­so­ri: sic ma­ri­ti fi­de­ius­sor post so­lu­tum ma­tri­mo­nium da­tus in so­li­dum do­tis no­mi­ne con­dem­na­tur. 1Rei au­tem co­hae­ren­tes ex­cep­tio­nes et­iam fi­de­ius­so­ri­bus com­pe­tunt, ut rei iu­di­ca­tae, do­li ma­li, iu­ris­iu­ran­di, quod me­tus cau­sa fac­tum est. igi­tur et si reus pac­tus sit in rem, om­ni­mo­do com­pe­tit ex­cep­tio fi­de­ius­so­ri. in­ter­ces­sio­nis quo­que ex­cep­tio, item quod li­ber­ta­tis one­ran­dae cau­sa pe­ti­tur, et­iam fi­de­ius­so­ri com­pe­tit. idem di­ci­tur et si pro fi­lio fa­mi­lias con­tra se­na­tus con­sul­tum quis fi­de­ius­se­rit, aut pro mi­no­re vi­gin­ti quin­que an­nis cir­cum­scrip­to: quod si de­cep­tus sit in re, tunc nec ip­se an­te ha­bet au­xi­lium, quam re­sti­tu­tus fue­rit, nec fi­de­ius­so­ri dan­da est ex­cep­tio.

7The Same, On Plautius, Book III. Exceptions to which certain persons are entitled do not pass to others; as, for instance, where a partner, a father, or a patron, can plead an exception to have judgment rendered against him only for the amount which he is able to pay; this privilege is not granted to a surety. Hence the surety of a husband, who was given after the marriage has been dissolved, will have judgment rendered against him for the entire amount of the dowry. 1Ad Dig. 44,1,7,1Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 120, Note 2.Exceptions which have reference to property can, however, also be pleaded by sureties; for example those based on res judicata, fraud, and where an oath has been exacted, if this was done under duress. Therefore, if the principal debtor entered into an agreement concerning the property, his surety will, by all means, be entitled to an exception. An exception based upon the appearance of a surety, on the ground that the claim will prejudice the right of freedom, can also be employed by him. The same must be said where anyone has become surety for a son under paternal control in violation of the Decree of the Senate, or for a minor of twenty-five years of age, who has been defrauded. If, however, he has been deceived with reference to the property, he will not be entitled to relief before he obtains restitution, and an exception should not be granted the surety.

8Idem li­bro quar­to de­ci­mo ad Plau­tium. Ne­mo pro­hi­be­tur plu­ri­bus ex­cep­tio­ni­bus uti, quam­vis di­ver­sae sunt.

8The Same, On Plautius, Book XIV. No one is forbidden to avail himself of several exceptions, even though they may be different in their character.

9Mar­cel­lus li­bro ter­tio di­ges­to­rum. Non uti­que ex­is­ti­ma­tur con­fi­te­ri de in­ten­tio­ne ad­ver­sa­rii is quo­cum agi­tur, quia ex­cep­tio­ne uti­tur.

9Marcellus, Digest, Book III. An adversary is not considered to admit the claim of the other party, merely because he has recourse to an exception.

10Mo­des­ti­nus li­bro duo­de­ci­mo re­spon­so­rum. Mo­des­ti­nus re­spon­dit: res in­ter alios iu­di­ca­ta aliis non ob­est, nec si is, con­tra quem iu­di­ca­tum est, he­res ex­sti­te­rit ei, con­tra quem ni­hil pro­nun­tia­tum est, he­redi­ta­rium11Die Großausgabe liest he­redi­ta­riam statt he­redi­ta­rium. ei li­tem in­fe­ren­ti prae­scri­bi ex ea sen­ten­tia pos­se, quam pro­prio no­mi­ne dis­cep­tans, an­te­quam he­res ex­sti­te­rit, ex­ce­pit.

10Modestinus, Opinions, Book XII. Modestinus gave it as his opinion that a judgment obtained by others does not prejudice those who were not parties to the suit; and even if he, against whom judgment was rendered, should become the heir of the person who gained the case, an exception, based on the fact that, under this judgment, he has failed to effect what he undertook in his own name before he became the heir, cannot be pleaded against him.

11Idem li­bro ter­tio de­ci­mo re­spon­so­rum. Qui ad­gni­tis in­stru­men­tis, qua­si ve­ra es­sent, sol­vit post sen­ten­tiam iu­di­cis, quae­ro, si post­ea co­gni­ta rei ve­ri­ta­te et re­per­tis fal­sis in­stru­men­tis ac­cu­sa­re ve­lit et pro­ba­re fal­sa es­se in­stru­men­ta, ex qui­bus con­ve­nie­ba­tur, cum in­stru­men­tis sub­scrip­se­rat ex prae­cep­to si­ve in­ter­lo­cu­tio­ne iu­di­cis, an prae­scrip­tio ei op­po­ni pos­sit? cum et prin­ci­pa­li­bus con­sti­tu­tio­ni­bus ma­ni­fes­te ca­ve­tur, et­si res iu­di­ca­ta es­set ex fal­sis in­stru­men­tis, si post­ea fal­sa in­ve­nian­tur, nec rei iu­di­ca­tae prae­scrip­tio­nem op­po­ni. Mo­des­ti­nus re­spon­dit ob hoc, quod per er­ro­rem so­lu­tio fac­ta est vel cau­tio de sol­ven­do in­ter­po­si­ta pro­po­ni­tur ex his in­stru­men­tis, quae nunc fal­sa di­cun­tur, prae­scrip­tio­ni lo­cum non es­se.

11The Same, Opinions, Book XIII. A man acknowledged as genuine certain notes which were, in fact, forged, and paid them after judgment was rendered against him. I ask, if the truth should subsequently be ascertained, and the notes found to be forged, and the defendant should desire to prove this in accordance with the order of the court, or an interlocutory decree; and, as he had admitted the genuineness of the said notes, whether he could be opposed by an exception, as it is clearly established by the Imperial Constitutions that although a judgment may be obtained by means of forged documents, and they are afterwards ascertained to be false, the fact that the matter has been decided cannot be pleaded in bar. Modestinus answered that, for the reason that payment was made through mistake, or security was furnished in the case of these notes, which were afterwards alleged to be forged, there would be no ground for an exception.

12Ul­pia­nus li­bro tri­gen­si­mo oc­ta­vo ad edic­tum. Ge­ne­ra­li­ter in prae­iu­di­ciis is ac­to­ris par­tes sus­ti­net, qui ha­bet in­ten­tio­nem se­cun­dum id quod in­ten­dit.

12Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book XXXVIII. Generally speaking, in questions dependent on preliminary decisions, he sustains the part of a plaintiff whose claim is in accordance with what he demands.

13Iu­lia­nus li­bro quin­qua­gen­si­mo di­ges­to­rum. Si post li­tem de he­redi­ta­te con­tes­ta­tam res sin­gu­lae pe­tan­tur, pla­cet non ob­sta­re ex­cep­tio­nem ‘quod prae­iu­di­cium he­redi­ta­ti non fiat’: fu­tu­ri enim iu­di­cii, non fac­ti no­mi­ne hu­ius­mo­di ex­cep­tio­nes com­pa­ra­tae sunt.

13Ad Dig. 44,1,13Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. III, § 616, Note 1.Julianus, Digest, Book L. If, after judgment has been pronounced in a case involving an entire estate, suit is brought to recover certain specified articles, it is settled that an exception on the ground that the estate will be prejudged cannot be pleaded in bar, for the reason that exceptions of this kind are introduced because they may affect a future decree, if not the one which has already been rendered.

14Al­fe­nus Va­rus li­bro se­cun­do di­ges­to­rum. Fi­lius fa­mi­lias pe­cu­lia­rem ser­vum ven­di­dit, pre­tium sti­pu­la­tus est: is ho­mo red­hi­bi­tus et post­ea mor­tuus est. et pa­ter eius pe­cu­niam ab emp­to­re pe­te­bat, quam fi­lius sti­pu­la­tus erat. pla­cuit ae­quum es­se in fac­tum ex­cep­tio­nem eum ob­ice­re: ‘quod pe­cu­nia ob ho­mi­nem il­lum ex­pro­mis­sa est, qui red­hi­bi­tus est’.

14Ad Dig. 44,1,14Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. II, § 321, Note 2; Bd. II, § 355, Note 6.Alfenus Varus, Digest, Book II. A son under paternal control sold a slave forming part of his peculium, and a stipulation was made for the price. The slave was returned under a conditional clause of the contract and afterwards died, and the father demanded from the purchaser the money which the son had stipulated should be paid to him. It was decided to be just that an exception in factum should be pleaded against him, setting forth that the money had been promised for the slave who had afterwards been returned under a condition of the contract.

15Iu­lia­nus li­bro quar­to ad Ur­seium Fe­ro­cem. Ad­ver­sus ex­cep­tio­nem iu­ris­iu­ran­di re­pli­ca­tio do­li ma­li non de­bet da­ri, cum prae­tor id age­re de­bet, ne de iu­re­iu­ran­do cu­ius­quam quae­ra­tur.

15Julianus, On Urseius Ferox, Book IV. A replication alleging bad faith should not be pleaded against an exception founded upon an oath taken in court, as the Prætor should see that no question is subsequently raised with reference to such an oath.

16Afri­ca­nus li­bro no­no quaes­tio­num. Fun­dum Ti­tia­num pos­si­des, de cu­ius pro­prie­ta­te in­ter me et te con­tro­ver­sia est, et di­co prae­ter­ea viam ad eum per fun­dum Sem­pro­nia­num, quem tuum es­se con­stat, de­be­ri. si viam pe­tam, ex­cep­tio­nem ‘quod prae­iu­di­cium prae­dio non fiat’ uti­lem ti­bi fo­re pu­ta­vit, vi­de­li­cet quod non ali­ter viam mi­hi de­be­ri pro­ba­tu­rus sim, quam prius pro­ba­ve­rim fun­dum Ti­tia­num meum es­se.

16Africanus, Questions, Book IX. You are in possession of the Titian Estate, and you and I have a lawsuit with reference to the ownership of the same. I allege that there is due to this estate a right of way through the Sempronian Estate, which belongs to you. If I bring suit to recover the right of way, it is held that you can avail yourself of an exception on the ground that the action pending for the ownership of the property ought not to be prejudged; that is to say, that I cannot show that I am entitled to the right of way before I have proved that the Titian Estate is mine.

17Pau­lus li­bro sep­tua­gen­si­mo ad edic­tum. Sed si an­te viam, de­in­de fun­dum Ti­tia­num pe­tat, quia et di­ver­sa cor­po­ra sunt et cau­sae re­sti­tu­tio­num dis­pa­res, non no­ce­bit ex­cep­tio.

17Paulus, On the Edict, Book LXX. If, however, I bring an action to recover the right of way, and afterwards one to recover the Titian Estate, as the objects of the litigation are distinct, and the reasons for restitution different, the exception will cause no injury.

18Afri­ca­nus li­bro no­no quaes­tio­num. Fun­di, quem tu pro­prium tuum es­se di­cis, par­tem a te pe­to et vo­lo si­mul iu­di­cio quo­que com­mu­ni di­vi­dun­do age­re sub eo­dem iu­di­ce: item si eius fun­di, quem tu pos­si­deas et ego pro­prium meum es­se di­cam, fruc­tus con­di­ce­re ti­bi ve­lim: quae­si­tum est an ex­cep­tio ‘quod prae­iu­di­cium fun­do par­ti­ve eius non fiat’ ob­stet an de­ne­gan­da sit. et utru­bi­que pu­tat in­ter­ve­ni­re prae­to­rem de­be­re nec per­mit­te­re pe­ti­to­ri, prius­quam de pro­prie­ta­te con­stet, hu­ius­mo­di iu­di­ciis ex­per­i­ri.

18Africanus, Questions, Book IX. I bring an action against you for half of a tract of land which you say is yours, and I wish, at the same time, to bring one in partition against you before the same judge. Again, if I allege that a tract of land of which you are in possession is mine, and I wish to recover the crops from you, the question arises whether an exception based on the principle that I ought not to bring a suit, the decision of which will prejudge the case which involves the ownership of all, or a part of the land in question, will operate as a bar, or should be denied. It is held that, in both instances, the Prætor should intervene, and not permit the plaintiff to institute proceedings of this kind, before the question of the ownership of the land has been determined.

19Mar­cia­nus li­bro ter­tio de­ci­mo in­sti­tu­tio­num. Om­nes ex­cep­tio­nes, quae reo com­pe­tunt, fi­de­ius­so­ri quo­que et­iam in­vi­to reo com­pe­tunt.

19Marcianus, Institutes, Book XIII. All exceptions to which the principal debtor is entitled can also be employed by his surety, even against the consent of the former.

20Pau­lus li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de con­cep­tio­ne for­mu­la­rum. Ex­cep­tio­nes op­po­nun­tur aut quia fac­tum sit quod fie­ri opor­tet aut quia fac­tum sit quod fie­ri non opor­tuit, aut quia fac­tum non sit quod fie­ri de­bue­rat. quia fac­tum est, quod fie­ri opor­tuit, da­tur ex­cep­tio rei ven­di­tae et tra­di­tae et rei iu­di­ca­tae: quia fac­tum est, quod fie­ri non opor­tuit, da­tur ex­cep­tio do­li ma­li: quia non fac­tum est, quod fie­ri de­buit, ut bo­no­rum pos­ses­sio­nis non da­tae.

20Paulus, On the Manner of Drawing up Formulas. Exceptions are pleaded either because the party did what he should have done; or because he did what he ought not to have done; or because he did not do what he should have done. An exception on the ground of property sold and delivered, or on that of res judicata, is granted for the reason that something has been done which ought to have been done. An exception on the ground of fraud is granted, because something has been done which ought not to have been done. An exception on the ground that prætorian possession of property which has been given has not been permitted, is granted because something was not done which should be done.

21Ne­ra­tius li­bro quar­to mem­bra­na­rum. Rei ma­io­ris pe­cu­niae prae­iu­di­cium fie­ri vi­de­tur, cum ea quaes­tio in iu­di­cium de­du­ci­tur, quae vel to­ta vel ex ali­qua par­te com­mu­nis est quaes­tio­ni de re ma­io­ri.

21Neratius, Parchments, Book IV. One action is said to prejudge another, with reference to a larger sum of money, when a question arises in court which is connected either wholly, or in part, with a suit involving a larger amount of property.

22Pau­lus li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de va­riis lec­tio­ni­bus. Ex­cep­tio est con­di­cio, quae mo­do ex­imit reum dam­na­tio­ne, mo­do mi­nuit dam­na­tio­nem. 1Re­pli­ca­tio est con­tra­ria ex­cep­tio, qua­si ex­cep­tio­nis ex­cep­tio.

22Paulus, Various Passages. An exception is a proceeding which sometimes relieves the defendant from the risk of having judgment rendered against him, and sometimes diminishes the amount of the judgment. 1A replication opposes an exception, and is, as it were, an exception to an exception.

23La­beo li­bro sex­to pi­tha­non a Pau­lo epi­to­ma­to­rum. Paulus: si quis sta­tuam in mu­ni­ci­pio ea men­te po­suit, ut ea mu­ni­ci­pii es­set, et eam pe­te­re vult, ex­clu­di eum opor­tet prae­scrip­tio­ne in fac­tum da­ta.

23Labeo, Epitomes of Probabilities by Paulus, Book III. Paulus: If anyone places a statue in a city with the intention that it shall belong to the city, and afterwards desires to claim it in court, he can be barred by an exception in factum.

24Her­mo­ge­nia­nus li­bro sex­to iu­ris epi­to­ma­rum. Fi­lius fa­mi­lias ex­cep­tio­nem iu­ris­iu­ran­di pa­tri quae­rit, si eum da­re non opor­te­re iu­ra­ve­rit.

24Hermogenianus, Epitomes of Law, Book VII. A son under paternal control can acquire for his father an exception on the ground of an oath having been taken, if he swears in court that his father does not owe anything.