Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. II6,
In ius vocati ut eant aut satis vel cautum dent
Liber secundus
VI.

In ius vocati ut eant aut satis vel cautum dent

(Persons Who Are Summoned Must Either Appear, or Give Bond or Security to Do So.)

1Pau­lus li­bro pri­mo ad edic­tum. Edic­to ca­ve­tur, ut fi­de­ius­sor iu­di­cio sis­ten­di cau­sa da­tus pro rei qua­li­ta­te lo­cu­ples de­tur ex­cep­tis ne­ces­sa­riis per­so­nis: ibi enim qua­lem­cum­que ac­ci­pi iu­bet: vel­uti pro pa­ren­te pa­tro­no,

1Paulus, On the Edict, Book I. It is provided by the Edict, “That where a surety is given that a party will appear in court, the property of the former must be ample, the position of the defendant being taken into consideration, except where the two are closely related, for then it directs that anyone can be accepted”; as, for instance, where a party is offered as surety for his parent or patron.

2Cal­lis­tra­tus li­bro pri­mo ad edic­tum mo­ni­to­rium. item pro pa­tro­na li­be­ris­ve suis vel uxo­re nuru­ve. tunc enim qua­lis­cum­que fi­de­ius­sor ac­ci­pi iu­be­tur: et in eum, qui non ac­ce­pe­rit, cum sci­ret eam ne­ces­si­tu­di­nem per­so­na­rum, quin­qua­gin­ta au­reo­rum iu­di­cium com­pe­tit,

2Callistratus, On the Monitory Edict, Book I. The same rule applies to the patroness, or to the children, the wife, or the daughter-in-law of the patron; for anyone of these persons can give a surety who must be accepted; and where the plaintiff refuses to accept him, being aware that the parties are nearly related, an action for fifty aurei will lie.

3Pau­lus li­bro quar­to ad edic­tum. quon­iam pro lo­cu­ple­te ac­ci­pi­tur fi­de­ius­sor in ne­ces­sa­riis per­so­nis.

3Paulus, On the Edict, Book IV. The reason for this is, that where persons are nearly related, any surety is accepted as being sufficiently solvent.

4Ul­pia­nus li­bro quin­qua­gen­si­mo oc­ta­vo ad edic­tum. Qui duos ho­mi­nes in iu­di­cio sis­ti pro­mi­sit, si al­te­rum ex­hi­bet, al­te­rum non, ex pro­mis­sio­ne non vi­de­tur eos ste­tis­se, cum al­ter eo­rum non sit ex­hi­bi­tus.

4Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book LVIII. Where anyone promises to produce two persons in court, and he produces one and not the other, he is held not to have kept his promise, as one of them has not been produced.